Hgh-Advice.INFO

There are a good number of sites that now claim to be “HGH Consumer Reports” sites, but in fact there are no genuine HGH consumer reports web sites or publications! The only genuine consumer reports sites are large consumer reports organizations with a known reputation that are supported by subscriptions and do not accept any advertising. In fact, if there were such products rated on a genuine consumer reports site it would mean that they would have had to do independent tests on a large number of patent groups for some time. This would be a long and costly project which would probably have to be financially supported by the manufacturers of HGH because the consumer reports organization would find it too costly to test the 100’s of hgh brands on 100’s of patent groups. The manufacturers of hgh products certainly would not want to contribute large sums of money to such a project when they know they would not be rated as number one on the charts. And if they did believe they would make number one why would they want to spend all that money when they can produce their own consumer reports rating site for a very low price and make it look like an unbiased consumer reports organization. Because anyone can cheaply and easily produce a web site and make it look however they want you can be sure that so called consumer reports hgh sites really belong to the seller of the product of that web site ranked #1

.
There has not yet been any legitimate clinical trials that have compared even the top 10 hgh products. Therefore, when some claim they have compared all the different products and that theirs came out with the highest results, it will pay you well to be skeptical.

Some companies claim that their product was chosen as the best by medical organization, anti-aging society or HGH guide. However, you will find that any such legitimate large organization always produces their own products and obviously because it belongs to them they will rate it as best. Also, other companies can produce their own straw societies or guides. If a product was indeed chosen by a reputable medical organization one will find that they have also chosen other products and that other medical organizations of equal standing have chosen different products.

Beware! There are sties on the Internet claiming they can show you ways to purchase the authentic HGH injections in Mexico or another foreign country if you will pay them for this information. There are even sites that claim they can actually sell you real HGH injections, and you either do not need a prescription, or they will obtain a prescription for you, but of course you can only use this prescription to purchase products from them. Also, beware of those claiming that they have a spray or a pill with actual HGH that will give you results the same as or close to needle injected HGH. This is an absolute lie and scam as the HGH molecule is too big to absorb through the mouth, tongue or the stomach. Also, beware that there are salesman and sites claiming that their natural HGH product (secretagogue) are the only ones that work for are better than others and yet do not have any test results to show and there are none that have reached higher than around 105% increase in IGF-1. They even use the argument that any product that claims to use actual HGH is useless because the HGH molecule is too big to be absorbed through the mouth, tongue or the stomach into the blood. They must completely disregard the fact that homeopathic HGH products have proven themselves effective through IGF-1 lab testing, and in fact homeopathic HGH products have the highest success rate of any HGH type of product in raising the IGF-1 level. They must not have bothered to learn about the principles of homeopathy and homeopathic HGH, or maybe they do know the truth, but they do not want others to know the truth. The truth about how homeopathy uses HGH to successfully make an effective formula that can be passed through the mucus membranes of the mouth is discussed below.

Misinformation About Increased Cancer Risk: Some in the Medical Community are saying that those with higher levels of Insulin Growth Factor One (IGF-1) have a higher risk for cancer. Obviously this should cause genuine concern. In earlier testing with human growth hormone there was some serious concern for researchers and physicians about the possibility of getting cancer with HGH therapy. Insulin Growth Factor One (IGF-1) and HGH both stimulated the growth of leukemia and cancer cells in culture and large doses of GH induced cancer in laboratory animals and promoted tumors in rats. However, according to Pharmacia Upjohn (1998) specific tests for cancer causing potential have not been done with HGH and tests in cells in culture and on chromosomes in living animals have not revealed evidence of mutation which is the first step in the development of cancer. Also, Dr. Edmund Chein treated 800 patients with HGH between 1994 and 1996 who were all over 40 which considering their age and the normal incidence rate of cancer means some of them should have gotten cancer and yet none did which indicates a protective effect from HGH replacement. Also, even more compelling is the fact that PSA levels, a marker of prostrate problems including cancer did not increase in any of the male patients. In one case a patient came to Chein with very high PSA levels of 50 to 60 (normal 0.0 to 4.0 and men with cancer 10 to 20s) This patient refused surgery and instead Chein treated him with GH along with DHEA and melatonin but not testosterone. The mans PSA levels came down to a range of 5 to 7. It is speculated that the reason this happened is because human growth hormone stimulated the immune system with its natural killer cells which effectively destroyed the cancer cells. There is also more extended studies supporting this. Check this out.

If direct HGH injections are ignorantly or blatantly used in a far higher and more frequent amount than the body can naturally produce it will significantly increase the risk of cancer. While there is no documented studies that show bodybuilders taking abusive amounts of between 10 and 100 times physiologic replacement levels have increased deaths, medical workers and researchers have seen the unmistakable side effects. In fact, Dr. Robert Goldman, president of the National Academy of Sports Medicine says, "I have seen people die from this. One of them was a 44 year old athlete who died of a massive heart attack." Athletes that do this are in the same risk category as Acromegalics who have a condition that pours abnormal amounts of HGH into their system. They have a higher mortality rate in cancer deaths, heart attack deaths and death from diabetes. Today even needle injected HGH is administered at safe levels and proper frequency.

However, there are professionals that do indicate far greater concern about cancer from needle injected HGH. For example, (Check it out) Samuel S. Epstein, M.D., Professor Environmental Medicine, University of Illinois School of Public Health, Chicago, and Chairman of the Cancer Prevention Coalition is very critical of using any type of HGH and points to prestigious peer reviewed scientific journals showing that elevated IGF-1 levels are strongly associated with major excess risks of colon, prostate, and breast cancers. It would be good if he actual showed these to see if they really apply or exist. However, he then says an amazing statement, "It should, however, be recognized that HGH absorption from the mouth and gut is unlikely to be significant, in striking contrast to complete absorption from injectable medication. Nevertheless, nutritional HGH supplements should be phased out until it can be shown that they do not elevate blood IGF-1 levels." Here is a strong critic of today's HGH therapy making it clear that our type of product, Pro-Blen HGH is exceptionally safe compared to the needle injected HGH that he claims he has evidence to show causes cancer. One has to seriously question and investigate if the evidence is really valid and serious that increased IGF-1 increases cancer risk when, for example, looking at the evidence against HGH replacement present in the next paragraph below. In fact the evidence points strongly the other way when looking at the up to date large clinical studies mentioned in the 2nd paragraph below.

A recent study reported in the July 27, 2002, issue of The Lancet, suggests a link between cancer and HGH replacement therapy. Check it out. However, they then say, that the hormone received by the people in the study came from human tissue, a practice that was discontinued when it was linked to the risk of inducing Creutzfeldt Jakob disease. Since 1985, patients treated with HGH have received a genetically engineered synthetic protein, and there are no data on whether this treatment modality is risky. The authors also said the findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the small numbers of patients in the cohort, and they emphasized the need for additional data from other sources. Also there is no evidence has linked HGH to cancer in athletes.

Also, Renasci Anti-Aging Center says the following on their site , "A number of long-term studies have been underway in the U.S. and abroad for nearly 15 years and have followed over 65,000 children and 6,000 adults treated with HGH. Reports from these phase IV studies are published annually and, to date, none has established a link between HGH treatment and an increased risk of any type of cancer. Recently, a comprehensive study reviewed the real risks facing children with brain tumors who were treated with growth hormone. This population has, traditionally, been considered at high-risk for tumor recurrence. The researchers found that the risk of tumor recurrence was, in fact, lower in the hGH-treated group as compared to the untreated group. Let's review the specifics.... The Study In this study 1 , one of the largest published of its kind, researchers reviewed the medical records of 1071 pediatric patients with brain tumors treated at the Great Ormond Street Hospital in London, England between 1965 and 1996. Of these, 180 patients had received HGH subsequent to their radiotherapy treatment and 891 patients received just radiotherapy but not hGH. In the hGH-treated group, 35 first recurrences were reported while in the untreated group there were 434 first recurrences. As such, the risk of having a recurrence of the brain tumor in the hGH-treated group compared with the untreated group was significantly less, as was the risk of death. These results are consistent with other literature published on the topic indicating that hGH therapy does not increase the risk of tumor formation. Renasci Anti-Aging Center continually monitors data from the following phase IV clinical trials: National Cooperative Growth Study (NCGS), National Cooperative Somatotropin Study (NCSS), Kabi International Growth Study (KIGS), and Kabi International Metabolic Study (KIMS). These long-term surveillance studies, conducted in the U.S. and Europe, continue to be important not only in tracking the benefits of hGH therapy but also in identifying and evaluating potential risks. Reference: Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism .
2000; 85: 4444-4449 "

All of this points to very strong evidence that HGH Pro-Blen homeopathic products are safe in regards to increasing the risk of cancer and will probably even prevent cancer. Even if there is a slight increase of risk for cancer the chances are far greater of dying from an heart attack than cancer and tests clearly show HGH therapy strengthens the heart and cardiovascular system. However, the very best thing to do is to take other anti-aging products that have been proven to protect from things like breast cancer.

The following links show in detail how to strongly protect yourself from cancer. If you go to http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag96/96jan1h.htm you will read there the following: "Anti-aging cell renewal hormones, precursor hormones and their metabolites include estrogen, progesterone, testosterone, DHEA, growth hormone, and insulin growth factors (ICF-1 and IGF-2).

The cell renewal properties of these hormones make them ideal anti-aging therapies. However, a significant risk factor in using growth hormones is the possibility that improper levels, or an inadequate balance of these hormones, may promote cancer cell proliferation.

Until we have a cure for cancer, following our recommended guidelines should provide women with significant life extension benefits without increased risk of breast (and other types) of cancer.

So here are the recommended guidelines to prevent this danger. The whole article including the summary is at: http://www.lef.org/protocols/prtcl-022.shtml